Flexible / structural modes
ADVANTAGES1 · dim 18SolvSRK wins. At the comparison noise level, SolvSRK beats the best baseline by at least 10 percentage points of survival, or by at least 0.05 balanced score when survival is tied. Use SolvSRK for this class of problem. All verdicts →
Modal oscillators coupled to rigid-body motion
Problem definition
Canonical benchmark implementation
Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.
Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _pd_controller(y, sp=None, mass=None):
"""Cascaded PD: pos error → desired attitude → torques. Returns (T, tau_x, tau_y, tau_z).
BA-2 (2026-04-29): added optional ``mass`` kwarg so the
factory variants in ``make_rhs_A3`` / ``make_rhs_A7`` can override
the module-global ``MASS`` for the hover-thrust feed-forward term.
THRUST_MAX is held at the parent airframe's value (39.24 N) since it
represents the physical thrust ceiling; airframe-mass perturbations
in {0.8..1.2} kg stay well within this envelope.
"""
if sp is None:
sp = HOVER_SP
eff_mass = MASS if mass is None else mass
px, py, pz = y[0], y[1], y[2]
vx, vy, vz = y[3], y[4], y[5]
phi, theta, psi = y[6], y[7], y[8]
p, q, r = y[9], y[10], y[11]
ax_d = KP_POS * (sp[0] - px) + KD_POS * (sp[3] - vx)
ay_d = KP_POS * (sp[1] - py) + KD_POS * (sp[4] - vy)
az_d = KP_POS * (sp[2] - pz) + KD_POS * (sp[5] - vz)
T_des = eff_mass * (G + az_d)
phi_des = (1.0 / G) * (ax_d * np.sin(psi) - ay_d * np.cos(psi))
theta_des = (1.0 / G) * (ax_d * np.cos(psi) + ay_d * np.sin(psi))
tau_x = KP_ATT * np.arctan2(np.sin(phi_des - phi), np.cos(phi_des - phi)) - KD_ATT * p
tau_y = KP_ATT * np.arctan2(np.sin(theta_des - theta), np.cos(theta_des - theta)) - KD_ATT * q
tau_z = KP_YAW * np.arctan2(np.sin(-psi), np.cos(-psi)) - KD_YAW * r
T_des = np.clip(T_des, 0.0, THRUST_MAX)
tau_x = np.clip(tau_x, -TORQUE_CLIP, TORQUE_CLIP)
tau_y = np.clip(tau_y, -TORQUE_CLIP, TORQUE_CLIP)
tau_z = np.clip(tau_z, -TORQUE_CLIP * 0.25, TORQUE_CLIP * 0.25)
return T_des, tau_x, tau_y, tau_z
def _body_forces(T, phi, theta, psi):
"""Thrust-to-inertial force components."""
cp, sp = np.cos(phi), np.sin(phi)
ct, st = np.cos(theta), np.sin(theta)
cy, sy = np.cos(psi), np.sin(psi)
Fx = T * (cy * st * cp + sy * sp)
Fy = T * (sy * st * cp - cy * sp)
Fz = T * ct * cp
return Fx, Fy, Fz
def _euler_kinematics(phi, theta, p, q, r):
"""Euler-angle rates from body rates. Returns (dphi, dtheta, dpsi)."""
cp, sp = np.cos(phi), np.sin(phi)
theta_c = np.clip(theta, -1.39, 1.39)
tan_th = np.tan(theta_c)
cos_th = np.cos(theta_c)
sec_th = 1.0 / cos_th if abs(cos_th) > 1e-12 else 1e12 * np.sign(cos_th)
dphi = p + q * sp * tan_th + r * cp * tan_th
dtheta = q * cp - r * sp
dpsi = (q * sp + r * cp) * sec_th
return dphi, dtheta, dpsi
def _quad12(y, T, tau_x, tau_y, tau_z, mass=None):
"""Core 12-state quadrotor dynamics. Returns d[0:12].
BA-2 (2026-04-29): added optional ``mass`` kwarg so the
factory variants can override the module-global ``MASS`` for the
translational acceleration / drag terms.
"""
eff_mass = MASS if mass is None else mass
phi, theta, psi = y[6], y[7], y[8]
p, q, r = y[9], y[10], y[11]
Fx, Fy, Fz = _body_forces(T, phi, theta, psi)
d = np.empty(12)
d[0] = y[3]; d[1] = y[4]; d[2] = y[5]
d[3] = (Fx - CD * y[3]) / eff_mass
d[4] = (Fy - CD * y[4]) / eff_mass
d[5] = (Fz - CD * y[5]) / eff_mass - G
d[6], d[7], d[8] = _euler_kinematics(phi, theta, p, q, r)
d[9] = (tau_x + (IYY - IZZ) * q * r) / IXX
d[10] = (tau_y + (IZZ - IXX) * p * r) / IYY
d[11] = (tau_z + (IXX - IYY) * p * q) / IZZ
return d
def rhs_A4(t, y):
body = y[:12]
q_modal = y[12:16]
qd_modal = y[16:20]
T, tx, ty, tz = _pd_controller(body)
d_body = _quad12(body, T, tx, ty, tz)
body_accel_mag = np.sqrt(d_body[3]**2 + d_body[4]**2 + d_body[5]**2)
d_q = qd_modal
d_qd = (-_MODAL_FREQS**2 * q_modal
- 2.0 * _MODAL_DAMP * _MODAL_FREQS * qd_modal
+ _MODAL_COUPLING * body_accel_mag)
modal_force_on_body = np.sum(_MODAL_COUPLING * q_modal)
d_body[3] += modal_force_on_body * 0.1
d_body[5] += modal_force_on_body * 0.05
return np.concatenate([d_body, d_q, d_qd])- Parameters
- CD = 0.1
- G = 9.81
- HOVER_SP = [0, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0]
- IXX = 0.0082
- IYY = 0.0082
- IZZ = 0.0148
- KD_ATT = 2.5
- KD_POS = 4
- KD_YAW = 1.5
- KP_ATT = 8
- KP_POS = 6
- KP_YAW = 4
- MASS = 1
- THRUST_MAX = 39.24
- TORQUE_CLIP = 2
- _MODAL_COUPLING = [0.05, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01]
- _MODAL_DAMP = [0.02, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01]
- _MODAL_FREQS = [94.2477796077, 175.929188601, 263.893782902, 376.991118431]
- sp = None
- mass = None
- Initial condition
- y(0) = [0, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, …] [shape=(20,), min=0, max=5]
- Horizon
- t ∈ [0, 30]
Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.
Fingerprint
Spread: low
Default noise: none
Recommendation snapshot
Clean best: TRBDF2
Noisy best: SolvSRK
Coverage
14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Ranked on survival, precision, and speed
Versions & freeze
Methodology →- Freeze
- 2026-08-13
- libsolvsrk
- 2.3.0
- SciPy
- 1.14
- SUNDIALS
- CVODE (bundled backend)
20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: Flexible / structural modes (flexible-structural-modes)
Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified
Results matrix
Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.
Objective
Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.
Noise level
| # | Solver | Survival | SCD | nfev | Wall | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TRBDF2external | 100% | 12.0 | 11,672 | 4.19 s | 0.905 |
| 2 | SciPy RadauSciPy | 100% | 11.2 | 24,102 | 778 ms | 0.884 |
| 3 | FBDFexternal | 100% | 11.0 | 11,990 | 4.18 s | 0.881 |
| 4 | SolvSRK | 100% | 10.3 | 40,084 | 889 ms | 0.864 |
| 5 | Vern7external | 100% | 9.3 | 30,142 | 4.02 s | 0.841 |
| 6 | Vern9external | 100% | 9.2 | 53,922 | 5.02 s | 0.837 |
| 7 | SciPy DOP853SciPy | 100% | 8.4 | 34,022 | 758 ms | 0.819 |
| 8 | SciPy RK23SciPy | 100% | 7.6 | 47,867 | 1.14 s | 0.800 |
| 9 | CVODE BDFexternal | 100% | 7.0 | 29,278 | 679 ms | 0.784 |
| 10 | SciPy LSODASciPy | 100% | 6.8 | 64,017 | 1.37 s | 0.782 |
| 11 | SciPy RK45SciPy | 100% | 6.5 | 48,668 | 1.10 s | 0.775 |
| 12 | Tsit5external | 100% | 6.5 | 50,526 | 4.39 s | 0.774 |
| 13 | CVODE Adamsexternal | 100% | 6.4 | 19,215 | 442 ms | 0.772 |
| 14 | SciPy BDFSciPy | 100% | 6.2 | 82,029 | 2.72 s | 0.767 |
At Clean, best balanced arm is TRBDF2 · SolvSRK survival 100%, SCD 10.3.
Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →
Cite this page
Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is - a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.
@misc{resonix_evidence_flexible_structural_modes_2026,
title = {Resonix Evidence Portal: Flexible / structural modes},
author = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://resonixusa.com/evidence/problems/flexible-structural-modes}},
note = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}Related
TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status